Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Pediatr Cardiol ; 2022 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2238791

ABSTRACT

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C) is a new entity that emerges 2-4 weeks after the SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. MIS-C can affect all systems, the most severe of which is cardiac involvement. The duration of the cardiac symptoms is still uncertain and may be persistent or prolonged. The American College of Rheumatology Clinical Guidelines recommends cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 2-6 months after the diagnosis of MIS-C in patients presenting with significant transient left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in the acute phase of illness (LV ejection fraction 50%) or persistent LV dysfunction. There are a few studies investigating cardiac MRI findings in MIS-C patients. In this study, we aimed to evaluate cardiac MRI findings, at the earliest 3 months after diagnosis, and compare these findings with the echocardiograms in children with MIS-C. A retrospective study including 34 MIS-C patients was conducted at a tertiary-level University Hospital between June 2020 and July 2021. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria were used in the diagnosis of MIS-C. Cardiac MRI was performed at least 3 months after MIS-C diagnosis. The study included 17 (50%) boys and 17 (50%) girls with a mean age of 9.31 ± 4.72 years. Initial echocardiographic evaluation revealed cardiac abnormality in 13 (38.2) patients; 4 (11.8%) pericardial effusion, 4 (11.8%) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 55%, and 5 (14.7%) coronary artery dilatation. Echocardiography showed normal LV systolic function in all patients during follow-up; coronary dilatation persisted in 2 of 5 (40%) patients at the 6th-month visit. Cardiac MRI was performed in 31 (91.2%) patients, and myocardial hyperemia was not detected in any patients (T1 relaxation time was < 1044 ms in all children). However, 9 (29%) patients' MRI showed isolated elevated T2 levels, and 19 (61.3%) revealed at least one of the following findings: pericardial effusion, right ventricular dysfunction, or LVEF abnormality. In patients with MIS-C, a high rate of cardiac involvement, particularly pericardial effusion was determined by cardiac MRI performed at the earliest 2-6 months after diagnosis. Even if echocardiography does not reveal any abnormality in the initial phase, cardiac MRI should be suggested in MIS-C patients in the late period. This is the first study reporting cardiac MRI findings in the late period of MIS-C patients.

2.
J Trop Pediatr ; 68(3)2022 04 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1860907

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies on age-related differences in clinical and laboratory features of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are limited. We aimed to evaluate the demographic, clinical, laboratory findings of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children younger than 6 months old and compare them with older children. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study, including 209 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection cases, was conducted between 11 March 2020 and 1 September 2021. The case group consisted of 47 patients younger than 6 months old, whereas the control group consisted of 162 patients older than 6 months old. RESULTS: The mean age of the case group was 2.77 ± 1.52 months, and the control group was 101.89 ± 65.77 months. Cough was statistically higher in the control group, and poor feeding was higher in the case group (p = 0.043, 0.010). The underlying disease rate was statistically higher in the control group; however, the hospitalization rate was higher in the case group (p = 0.036, 0.001). The case group had significantly lower median values of the absolute neutrophil count, hemoglobin and higher median values of white blood cell, absolute lymphocyte count and platelet than the control group (p < 0.05). C-reactive protein, fibrinogen values were significantly lower, and procalcitonin, D-dimer, troponin T, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide significantly higher in the case group (p < 0.05). Lymphopenia was more common in the control group, whereas neutropenia was more common in the case group (p = 0.001, 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: We showed that most children younger than 6 months old had mild and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, the hospitalization rate was higher, and neutropenia was more common in older children. Lay summaryStudies on age-related differences in clinical and laboratory features on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in pediatric patients are limited. We aimed to evaluate the demographic, clinical and laboratory findings of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children younger than 6 months old and compare them with older children. A single-center retrospective study was conducted, including 209 SARS-CoV-2 infection cases. The case group consisted of 47 patients younger than 6 months old, and the control group consisted of 162 patients older than 6 months old. Most children younger than 6 months old had mild and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, the hospitalization rate was higher than older children. Neutropenia was more common in patients younger than 6 months than older children with SARS-CoV-2 infection, even if underlying diseases were excluded.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lymphopenia , Neutropenia , Adolescent , COVID-19/diagnosis , Child , Humans , Infant , Neutropenia/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ; 14(4)2021 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1305767

ABSTRACT

To date, the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide include viral infections, such as Ebola, influenza virus, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and recently COVID-19 disease, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Currently, we can count on a narrow range of antiviral drugs, especially older generation ones like ribavirin and interferon which are effective against viruses in vitro but can often be ineffective in patients. In addition to these, we have antiviral agents for the treatment of herpes virus, influenza virus, HIV and hepatitis virus. Recently, drugs used in the past especially against ebolavirus, such as remdesivir and favipiravir, have been considered for the treatment of COVID-19 disease. However, even if these drugs represent important tools against viral diseases, they are certainly not sufficient to defend us from the multitude of viruses present in the environment. This represents a huge problem, especially considering the unprecedented global threat due to the advancement of COVID-19, which represents a potential risk to the health and life of millions of people. The demand, therefore, for new and effective antiviral drugs is very high. This review focuses on three fundamental points: (1) presents the main threats to human health, reviewing the most widespread viral diseases in the world, thus describing the scenario caused by the disease in question each time and evaluating the specific therapeutic remedies currently available. (2) It comprehensively describes main phytochemical classes, in particular from plant foods, with proven antiviral activities, the viruses potentially treated with the described phytochemicals. (3) Consideration of the various applications of drug delivery systems in order to improve the bioavailability of these compounds or extracts. A PRISMA flow diagram was used for the inclusion of the works. Taking into consideration the recent dramatic events caused by COVID-19 pandemic, the cry of alarm that denounces critical need for new antiviral drugs is extremely strong. For these reasons, a continuous systematic exploration of plant foods and their phytochemicals is necessary for the development of new antiviral agents capable of saving lives and improving their well-being.

4.
Ann Clin Lab Sci ; 50(6): 848-851, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-984121

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the course of biomarkers on admission and follow-up in order to identify early predictors for poor outcome in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: In this study, 132 COVID-19 patients were classified as good outcome (n=62) and poor outcome (n=70) groups. Laboratory parameters were evaluated on admission and within 5-7 days after hospitalization. RESULTS: Baseline levels of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, CRP, procalcitonin, ferritin, D-dimer and LDH were higher (p<0.01); lymphocyte count was lower in the poor outcome patients. During follow-up there was a larger decrease in lymphocyte count and more prominent increases in other biomarkers (p<0.001). In ROC analysis, the AUCs strongly indicated the poor outcome on days 5-7 of the hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the follow-up measurements of the biomarkers better predict the poor outcome in COVID-19 pneumonia.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/analysis , COVID-19/mortality , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Severity of Illness Index , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL